Ringo Legal, PLLC Logo

Key Takeaways

  • Texas Supreme Court lifted temporary injunctions on child abuse investigations regarding gender-affirming care.
  • The ruling did not define gender-affirming care for minors as child abuse.
  • Injunctions were dissolved because original plaintiffs' cases were closed or children became adults.
  • State Attorney General's nonbinding opinion deemed gender-affirming care as child abuse.
  • This opens the door for DFPS to investigate new allegations against other Texas families.

Hey, let's talk about what just happened at the Texas Supreme Court. They made a big move last Friday, clearing the way for the state to investigate parents over gender-affirming care for their kids. Essentially, the court tossed out temporary orders that had been stopping these child abuse investigations.

Now, here’s the important bit: the court *didn't* actually say whether providing puberty blockers or hormone therapy to a child is child abuse. That big question is still hanging out there. Instead, the ruling was more technical. The temporary injunctions, which had protected specific families, weren't needed anymore. Why? Because the state agency, the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), had already closed its investigations into three of those families. For a fourth family, the child involved is now an adult, so DFPS can't investigate them anyway. It's a legal loophole, really.

This whole situation kicked off a couple of years back. Our Attorney General, Ken Paxton, put out an opinion stating that certain gender-transitioning medical care for kids counted as child abuse. Governor Greg Abbott then told DFPS to start looking into any reports. Naturally, some families and an organization called PFLAG, Inc. went to court, trying to shield parents from these state probes. They managed to get those temporary injunctions, stopping DFPS in those specific cases.

The Supreme Court explained that there's no real threat DFPS will investigate these *particular* plaintiffs anymore. That’s because their cases are either shut down or the children are grown. So, the court decided, why keep the injunctions in place? This doesn't stop DFPS from looking into *other* families. It means the state now has a clearer path to act on the Governor's directive and the AG's opinion if new complaints come in.

For you, this means the legal landscape around gender-affirming care for minors in Texas is still pretty uncertain. Parental rights in medical decisions for trans kids remain a hotly contested issue, with the state asserting its authority to investigate. It's a big deal for families across Texas.