← Back to Legal News
Texas Court Orders Xcel to Replace Faulty Power Poles After Deadly Wildfires
Key Takeaways
- •Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton successfully secured a court injunction against Xcel Energy.
- •The injunction legally mandates Xcel to replace severely damaged poles in high-risk wildfire zones within 14 days, and newly identified high-priority poles within one day.
- •Xcel is required to conduct annual large-scale inspections of at least 35,000 poles in wildfire-prone areas.
- •The action reinforces corporate liability for public safety negligence, especially after Xcel admitted responsibility for sparking the Smokehouse Creek fire.
- •This legal step is part of broader litigation, including Paxton's pursuit of monetary damages, aiming for greater accountability and potential changes to utility operations.
Hey, if you live in Texas, you've probably heard about those awful wildfires that tore through the Panhandle last year. They burned a million acres, killed three people, and wiped out tons of cattle. Now, there's a big update on who's being held accountable.
A Texas district court just hit Xcel, that big electric company serving over 200,000 customers here, with a serious order. Basically, the court told them they *have* to replace damaged power poles in areas where wildfires are a real threat. This whole thing came about after an agreement between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office and Xcel.
Paxton's pretty direct about it. He says this is a key initial move to hold Xcel responsible for the 2024 fires. You see, right after the Smokehouse Creek fire, which was the biggest in our state's history, Xcel admitted one of their poles started it. That's a pretty heavy admission for a utility company.
"Xcel made the smart choice by working with my office and agreeing to these necessary initial steps," Paxton said. He's not stopping there, though. He’s vowed to keep pushing to make sure justice is served and that careless utility providers don't spark fires again. It’s about public safety, plain and simple.
Now, Xcel, for its part, said this agreement mostly follows the pole-replacement stuff they started *two years ago* after the Smokehouse Creek fire. They've also stated they'll keep working with Texas as they focus on making things safer. You might be wondering, if they were already doing it, why did it take a lawsuit? That’s a good question to ask.
This whole situation has brought a lot of legal action. Paxton actually sued Xcel in December, not just for an injunction, but for straight-up monetary damages. And you know, earlier this year, a Panhandle businessman named Salem Abraham even pushed to kick Xcel out of the region entirely. He wants a new utility provider. So, when this court order came down, Abraham said anything Paxton can do to force Xcel to get better is welcome news. It shows you the level of public frustration and the desire for change.
So, what exactly does this court order demand from Xcel?
First, they've got to replace any poles with serious structural damage in high-risk wildfire zones within just 14 days. That's a tight deadline.
After they finish, they have to tell the state in writing.
And going forward? Any *new* high-priority damaged poles they find must be replaced within *one day* of discovery. That's even faster, right?
Beyond that, Xcel also has to regularly inspect its setup in wildfire-prone areas. We're talking about checking at least 35,000 poles every single year.
Xcel says it's already been boosting its infrastructure. They report replacing over 19,000 poles since 2021 and putting more than $111 million into making their wooden poles safer. They've also rolled out a wildfire prevention plan, installed AI cameras to spot fires fast, used equipment that resists fire better, and even moved some power lines underground.
Earlier this year, the company mentioned they had 80 high-priority poles left that weren't in high-risk zones, and they were replacing those quickly. Each of those can cost over $15,000. Plus, they've got another 1,338 poles that need replacing, though many of those are considered low priority.
For you, as a Texan, this isn't just about a utility company. It's about your safety, your property, and the air we breathe. When a company's negligence leads to such widespread disaster, it brings up big questions about their legal duty to public safety and how much oversight state government should have. This court order is a step toward making sure companies take their responsibilities seriously, especially when lives and livelihoods are on the line. It's a win for accountability, and it sets a clearer standard for how utilities operate in our state.
Original source: Texas State Government: Governor, Legislature & Policy Coverage.
