Ringo Legal, PLLC Logo

Key Takeaways

  • Federal immigration policies and increased scrutiny directly contribute to state university budget shortfalls, linking federal actions to institutional financial stability.
  • The abrupt termination of international student visas and broader travel restrictions raise critical questions about due process and federal authority over individuals' legal status.
  • State higher education funding formulas, often dependent on enrollment, make public universities highly susceptible to federal policy changes regarding international student populations.
  • The financial challenges compel universities like UNT to consider drastic measures, underscoring the public policy need to adapt funding models, such as moving to outcomes-based systems.
Alright, let's talk about something big happening at the University of North Texas that hits closer to home than you might think. UNT is staring down a projected $45 million budget hole, and it's largely because fewer international students are showing up. This isn't just about university finances; it's about federal policy, state funding, and even some sticky questions around constitutional rights for those coming to study here. See, international students usually pay a lot more in tuition than Texas residents do. They're a big piece of the financial puzzle for public universities. When their numbers drop, it leaves a massive gap. UNT's President, Harrison Keller, told everyone that this deficit jumped from about $31.2 million just last August. That's a serious jump, and it’s mainly because international graduate student enrollment plummeted from around 6,200 in fall 2024 to less than 3,400 by fall 2025. You don't need a calculator to know that hurts. Keller put it straight: "This isn't a temporary deficit." It's structural, meaning it's tied to bigger, more persistent issues. The university isn't just looking at minor tweaks; they're talking about consolidating programs, asking faculty to teach more classes, and even offering voluntary separation packages. Basically, tough decisions are coming, and fast. So, why the sudden drop in international students? This is where federal actions come into play. Over the past few years, we’ve seen increased federal attention on international students, including sharper scrutiny and expanded travel restrictions. Remember that incident where hundreds of international students had their legal status abruptly terminated in a federal database, only for the government to reverse it weeks later? That kind of uncertainty leaves a mark. While officials at the time mentioned national security concerns and pro-Palestinian protests, many students caught in the crossfire said they hadn't done anything wrong. Think about what that means for someone trying to decide if they should move halfway across the world to study. If you're wondering if your visa might get pulled without clear cause, or if you'll face expanded travel bans, it's a huge disincentive. This whole situation raises questions about due process and the federal government's power to suddenly impact individuals' lives and academic futures. It also makes you wonder about the U.S.'s standing as a welcoming place for global talent. UNT isn't alone, but it's getting hit harder than many. Texas is a major hub for international students, and UNT has historically enrolled more of them than any other state university. The decline statewide was about 11% from 2024 to 2025, but UNT's dive was a whopping 35%. That's a significant blow. Now, how does this tie into state policy? Texas public universities get some of their state funding based on enrollment. So, when international student numbers fall, it means less state cash too. Keller pointed out this funding formula caused about $32 million less state support for UNT this biennium. This connection makes state universities incredibly vulnerable to shifts in federal immigration policy. Keller's also pitching an idea to state lawmakers for 2027: change how universities get funded. Instead of just counting credit hours, he wants funding tied to outcomes – like how many students graduate and how well they do in the workforce. He calls the current formulas "antiquated." It's a big policy debate, especially since Texas already moved to this outcomes-based model for community colleges in 2023. It could be a way to stabilize university finances, making them less susceptible to the ebb and flow of international enrollment influenced by federal policies. Ultimately, UNT is scrambling. They're looking to grow enrollment in other ways, like through online programs and community college transfers, but those things take time to generate real revenue. This whole situation shows just how interconnected federal immigration rules, state education funding, and the financial health of our universities really are. It's a tough spot, and there are no easy answers.